Penuel Mlotshwa Speaks Out After Racial Slurs Over Springbok Selection Views

by Zaghrah Anthony

Podcaster and social commentator Penuel Mlotshwa has found himself at the centre of South Africa’s never-ending rugby transformation debate. After questioning the racial balance of the latest Springbok squad, Mlotshwa says he was bombarded with racist abuse, including being called the K-word.

A Question That Sparked a Storm

Mlotshwa, who has often shared his love for the Boks and respect for coach Rassie Erasmus, recently posted that he felt something wasn’t adding up with the national side’s latest selection. Noting that the team photo featured only two black players, he suggested that some of the country’s best black talent may have been overlooked.

“I ask these questions because this is a team we love and support,” he explained in an X (formerly Twitter) post. “When you speak out, you end up in the comments section where racists call you the K-word, telling you black people shouldn’t be in rugby, and that we mustn’t worry about transformation.”

Supporting Players, Not the Brand

Despite his criticism, Mlotshwa stressed that his issue is not with the players or Erasmus directly. In fact, he called Erasmus “the most fair and pro-transformation coach we’ve had in a while.” His frustration, he says, is with what he sees as a bigger problem within the Springbok brand itself.

“I’ll keep supporting the players as individuals,” he wrote, “but not the brand. The brand still feels tainted if we can’t have hard conversations about quotas and merit.”

The podcaster even admitted it reminded him why many black fans in the past supported the All Blacks, a quiet protest against exclusion in South African rugby.

Are Top Black Players Missing Out?

Mlotshwa went further, naming players like Sanele Nohamba, Hacjivah Dayimani, Ntuthuko Mchunu, Phepsi Buthelezi, Celimpilo Gumede, Lukhanyo Am, Makazole Mapimpi, and others who he says deserve to be in the conversation.

He even speculated about the injury status of Willie le Roux, suggesting that Aphelele Fassi might have been brought in late because of pressure over the lack of black players.

“Are the best black players being kept out of the Boks?” he asked.

A Familiar Debate in South African Rugby

Mlotshwa’s comments have reignited an age-old debate in South African sport: how to balance merit and transformation in a country still scarred by its past. The Springboks have long been seen as both a symbol of unity and a lightning rod for division. From the iconic 1995 Rugby World Cup to the more recent 2019 triumph, the team has often been held up as proof of progress. Yet moments like this remind us that for many fans, transformation remains an unfinished project.

On social media, reactions have been sharply divided. Some praised Mlotshwa for voicing uncomfortable truths, while others accused him of undermining the team’s merit-based selection. And then there were the ugly racist slurs, proof that rugby still carries weight far beyond the try line.

Penuel’s experience highlights not just the question of who makes the squad, but whether South Africa is ready to have honest, respectful conversations about transformation without the conversation collapsing into racism. His decision to “step back” from supporting the Springbok brand speaks to a deeper trust issue between fans of colour and the structures that govern rugby.

{Source: The South African}

Featured Image: X {@SundayWorldZA}